Venezuela's push to restructure as much as $240 billion in sovereign debt by November — one of the fastest timelines ever attempted for a restructuring of this scale — risks locking the country into unsustainable obligations just as it needs billions to rebuild from devastating earthquakes.
The government of Nicolas Maduro, captured by U.S. forces in January, aims to secure the early stages of an overhaul of its sovereign debt and that of state oil company Petroleos de Venezuela SA as soon as November, according to bondholders. The goal is to unlock investment in sectors from oil to power after years of financial isolation.
"This will surely be the most complex sovereign debt restructuring of my lifetime," said Mitu Gulati, a sovereign debt expert and professor at the University of Virginia. "I've never seen anything done like this."
Total liabilities approach $240 billion, according to a Financial Times report cited by investors, encompassing bonds, past-due interest, arbitration awards and oil-backed loans from China. Greece's $200 billion restructuring took roughly a year following its 2012 default. Venezuela is attempting to complete the early stages in about six months.
The complexity is compounded by June's earthquakes, which killed more than 3,000 people and caused an estimated $7 billion in damage — equivalent to as much as 6% of gross domestic product, according to Oxford Economics. The disaster struck La Guaira and other areas, damaging hospitals, schools and infrastructure in an economy that has already contracted an estimated 75% since 2013 under the weight of sanctions, corruption and underinvestment.
The Credibility Gap
At the heart of the debate is whether Venezuela can produce a credible Debt Sustainability Analysis without International Monetary Fund involvement. The government hired Centerview Partners in May and aimed to complete the DSA by end-June, a deadline that has slipped to July. The IMF, whose assessments typically take months, said it is not involved.
Veteran sovereign debt lawyer Lee Buchheit, who represented Venezuela's opposition in 2019, said the timeline is far too short for a credible DSA. Both sides may have incentives to strike a quick deal — authorities to signal a return to international markets and bondholders to avoid a more rigorous IMF-led assessment that could reduce recoveries.
"What may be presented as a DSA will in fact just be a manufactured set of numbers that appears to support some form of bond restructuring," Buchheit said.
The Trump administration has issued general licenses to manage the revival of Venezuela's petroleum and mining sectors and attract foreign investment. But this opening has not been conditioned on progress toward key election-enabling steps, including a new electoral commission, an electoral timeline and a new electoral tribunal, according to Connor Pfeiffer of FDD Action, a policy advocacy group.
The Case for a Bigger Haircut
The earthquake damage strengthens the case for Venezuela to seek deeper relief from creditors. Joan Domene, chief economist for Latin America at Oxford Economics, called the $7 billion in damage a "massive blow" to an already fragile recovery.
"It will make the case for the government to plead for an even bigger haircut," Domene said.
Some investors express cautious optimism. "It's right to have a healthy degree of skepticism," said Elina Theodorakopoulou of Manulife Investment Management, which holds Venezuelan bonds. "But surely you would believe that the people that are putting that together realize the significance of doing that credibly."
The last time a major emerging-market debtor attempted a restructuring of this speed was Argentina in 2020, which took about four months to reach a deal with private creditors but left the country locked out of international capital markets for years afterward. Venezuela's opaque debt stock — with no published economic statistics for years — makes the challenge even greater.
If the restructuring proceeds without independent verification, the risk is that Venezuela emerges with a debt burden that crowds out spending on infrastructure and healthcare precisely when both are most needed. "If you give away all of your goodies now... my worry is that we're just pushing the real restructuring problem down the road," Gulati said.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.