Trump called off the most severe strike in history against Iran, claiming a deal — but Tehran denies any agreement exists.
Trump called off the most severe strike in history against Iran, claiming a deal — but Tehran denies any agreement exists.

Trump cancelled a planned military strike on Iran that he described as potentially the most severe in history, claiming "perimeters of a deal" were agreed, while Tehran denied any such agreement exists.
"Any US or Israeli attack would meet a proportionate response," Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, told his Saudi counterpart on Saturday, according to Iranian state media.
The US State Department issued security alerts for citizens in 10 countries across the region, urging them to exercise increased caution and consider leaving. Trump had said on Friday the US would hit Iran "very hard," and US media reported Washington and Israel were preparing to strike Iran's energy infrastructure.
The cancellation followed a phone call from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman urging Trump to return to negotiations. Trump claimed the deal would bring the "Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT" and end what he called Iran's nuclear threat. But with Tehran denying the claim, the question of whether the standoff is truly de-escalating or merely paused remains open.
The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly 21 percent of global oil trade, making any disruption to shipping through the waterway a direct threat to crude prices and energy markets worldwide. Brent crude has historically priced in a geopolitical risk premium during US-Iran confrontations, and the latest escalation was no exception. The planned strike, which Trump said would have been "the most violent strike in history," was set to target Iran's energy infrastructure — a move that would have directly threatened the world's most critical oil chokepoint.
The decision to call it off came after regional pressure, with Saudi Arabia's crown prince directly intervening. The deal Trump claims to have reached would reportedly include the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and an end to Iran's nuclear program. However, Iran's denial of any agreement raises questions about whether the claimed deal is real or a face-saving measure.
For Indian markets, the geopolitical situation is a key driver this week. The RBI's Monetary Policy Committee meeting (August 3-5) coincides with the ongoing US-Iran tensions, and analysts at Religare Broking and Motilal Oswal flagged crude oil price stability and geopolitical developments as primary market triggers. Foreign investors turned net buyers of Indian equities in July, pumping in Rs 20,200 crore, after four straight months of selling.
The last time Trump called off a strike on Iran at the last minute was in June 2019, after Iran shot down a US drone. In that episode, Brent crude spiked more than 4 percent in the days following the initial escalation before retreating as diplomatic channels reopened. The current situation carries similar dynamics, though the stakes are higher given the explicit threat to the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran's foreign ministry has not issued an official response to Trump's claim of a deal. The US State Department's security alerts for 10 countries suggest the administration is not fully confident in the de-escalation. If the deal materializes, crude prices could see a sharp correction as the risk premium unwinds. If it does not, the market faces the prospect of a renewed escalation with the threat of supply disruption through the Strait of Hormuz.
For investors, the key question is whether the risk premium in crude prices and safe-haven assets will persist. The RBI's rate decision on August 5 will be closely watched, with markets pricing in the impact of geopolitical uncertainty on inflation and growth. A sustained escalation would complicate the central bank's policy path, while a genuine de-escalation could provide relief to import-dependent economies across Asia.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.