Jimmy Kimmel said his interview with Texas Senate candidate James Talarico will run on YouTube rather than ABC's broadcast network, a decision he attributed to FCC pressure over the equal-time rule — the same rule the agency extended to late-night talk shows in January.
"For a lot of years, for the whole 20-plus years of our show, in fact, I've been interviewing Americans who are running for office with no problem at all," Kimmel told his studio audience on Wednesday. "Now that he's president, his FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions, guest bookings it would seem they don't like."
The interview was posted to the Jimmy Kimmel Live YouTube channel instead of airing on the roughly 200 ABC affiliates that carry the program, including the network's owned-and-operated stations in Texas. Kimmel framed the move as protection for local license holders rather than a network decision: "Out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television."
The equal-time rule, codified in Section 315 of the Communications Act, requires a broadcaster that gives airtime to one legally qualified candidate to offer comparable time and placement to opposing candidates who request it. The FCC historically treated talk shows featuring interviews as exempt as "bona fide news interview programs." In January, the Carr FCC ordered broadcast stations to apply the rule to late-night and daytime talk shows "motivated by partisan purposes," a standard the agency has not applied to predominantly conservative talk radio.
The exposure is concentrated in Disney's balance sheet. ABC owns eight television stations whose licenses are already under an early review the FCC ordered in April, one day after President Trump and first lady Melania Trump called for Kimmel's firing over a joke. Disney sued the FCC in August, arguing its First Amendment rights were violated and that "ABC must now evaluate any invitation to a political candidate for its potential consequences, including whether it might later be cited by the Commission as a basis for non-renewal in the Stations' impending license renewal proceedings." The FCC last week urged a court to dismiss that suit and let the nonrenewal proceeding continue.
The View stopped booking candidates first
The Talarico booking is the second time the same guest has been pulled from a broadcast show. In February, Stephen Colbert said CBS forbade him from interviewing Talarico; CBS denied prohibiting the interview but said it gave Colbert "legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule for two other candidates." Colbert also moved the segment to YouTube.
The FCC opened a proceeding in May 2026 to examine whether The View should keep its exemption as a bona fide news interview program. The View has not aired a political candidate interview since that proceeding began — a measurable contraction in political airtime on a single ABC program, achieved without any formal enforcement action.
FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, the commission's only Democrat, said the agency "has no lawful authority to threaten broadcast licenses over guest bookings or editorial decisions," adding that "no host, local affiliate, or network should have to weigh federal retaliation before booking a guest for a newsworthy interview."
What the license fight costs Disney
The financial stakes sit in the renewal proceedings, not in the Kimmel segment. Nonrenewal of the eight ABC-owned station licenses would remove Disney's direct access to the broadcast distribution channel reaching those markets, and watchdog groups told a federal court they worry Disney will settle with the FCC on terms that "limit the content provided by the ABC stations" — a settlement that would trade editorial latitude for license certainty ahead of the November midterms.
Disney has not disclosed a financial estimate for the regulatory exposure, and no FCC action has imposed a fine or a license condition to date. The company's next material disclosure point is its quarterly filing, where any accrual or settlement language would appear; the FCC's motion to dismiss Disney's suit remains pending before the court.
For the broader broadcast sector, the operative precedent is the January order's "partisan purposes" test. It gives the commission discretion over which talk shows fall inside the equal-time rule, and it applies to every station group holding a license — not only Disney. Nexstar, Sinclair and Fox, which operate their own station portfolios, face the same interpretive question the next time a host books a candidate.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.